|
|
The Benefits of Universal / Socialized MedicineA National Health Care Strategy Ensures Coverage, Medical Treatment
With America on the cusp of adopting a new national health care strategy, it is important to detail the benefits of ensuring coverage for all citizens, rich and poor.
The United States of America stands alone in one regard – that being that it is the only wealthy, first-world nation that does not have universal medical coverage for citizens. A dubious distinction, to say the least, but a distinction that may soon become history given the large amount of discussion and debate surrounding the issue both during the 2008 Presidential Election as well as the ensuing first term of the Obama Administration. Examples in Practice – Canada and EuropeIn 1946, Tommy Douglas and his Co-operative Commonwealth Foundation or CCF Party brought the first iteration of universal health care coverage to his home province of Saskatchewan. Since then, the practice has proven largely successful both in practice and with regards to popularity amongst the electorate - not surprisingly given that medical care is afforded to each and every Canadian citizen without fee. The exceptions to the modern universal coverage in Canada are the areas of dentistry, optometry, and prescription pharmaceuticals - though those who cannot afford mandatory prescription medicine are often afford individual funding through either Government agency or charitable organization. Canadians today live in a situation wherein all legal residents of each individual province and territory are medically insured under a large group plan - thirteen provinces and territories in total. The quality of life due to this policy has increased substantially, particularly for the working and middle classes - this being reflected in the relative standard of living index provided by the UNDP or United Nations Development Programme. Canada places third, preceded by Iceland and Norway only and succeeded by a litany of other European nations with one major component of their GDP in alignment - a universal health care strategy. While overall GDP per capita may not approach the numbers for those in the United States, this is not reflected statistically in any negative sense, with regard to the actual standard of living or the medical apparatus of the nation. Factcheck.org Findings and The Actual CostWhen the question was raised on the nonpartisan debate website Factcheck.org with reference to whether or not health care was better in Canada than in the United States raised a few interesting findings. The first acknowledgment is that while wait times were slightly longer they were surely not as abysmally or commonly as long as made out to be by adversaries of the universal health care. The remainder of the findings prove most interesting, the key amongst them being:
On top of these findings, one must also consider the primary talking point used by opponents of universal health care in the United States - the apparent cost. Strikingly enough, the percentage of GDP consumed by health care in Canada, where all residents are universally insured, is 10.7% as opposed to a full 16.3% of GDP being allotted to health care in the United States – the only country in the developed world without universal coverage for it's citizens! What Doctors Have to Say About ItMany grassroots political groups, most prominently the PNHP or Physicians for a National Health Program, rightly argue that the current health care system in the United States benefits the poor and middle classes very little, and serves the best interests of the pharmaceutical and drug industries. These physicians argue that, much like in the vein of the myriad other developed nations whom have successfully implemented national health care into their budget, Americans deserve better coverage regardless of socioeconomic status. With all other nations whom have adopted universal or "socialized" health care coverage reporting much higher standards of living as well as ranging between 7-11% of their GDP being allotted for health care it seems somewhat antiquated to rebel against this rather progressive and humane ideal. Other Articles Pertaining to Social Issues and DebatesSourcesCanada Health Act, 1984 Jessica Henig, Factcheck.org – "Is Health Care Better in Canada?" Physicians for a National Health Program United Nations Development Programme World Health Organization
The copyright of the article The Benefits of Universal / Socialized Medicine in Activism is owned by Nicholas Morine. Permission to republish The Benefits of Universal / Socialized Medicine in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|